Context of Practice

Thursday, 22 November 2018

COP 3 - Saucy Fish Co.


I love this branding as inspiration for a masculine packaging design. The dark black works well with the strong sans serif typeface. I like how they don't usually use imagery as well - just purely graphics. This keeps things simplistic. Clutter is removed, which is appealing to men.


Image result for the saucy fish co Image result for the saucy fish co


Image result for the saucy fish co
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:50 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Names and Other Ideas

Macaroni Cheese;

Masc
-'mac & cheese' - simplified shorter version
-strong typeface, either sans serif or serif
-simplistic graphics and imagery
-wording 'creamy, cheesey, thick, rich'
-emphasis on quick and easy to cook
-dark colours

Fem
-'macaroni cheese' - longer, more detailed
-cutesy, handwritten style type
-pastel light colours
-decorative graphic elements
-wording 'healthy, light'
-emphasis on health element

Image result for macaroni cheese



Lasagne;

Masc
-'steak' lasagne, use of word 'meat' - 'meat sauce'
-wording 'rich, red wine, creamy, hearty, strong'
-dark colours
-focus on meat quality
-strong typeface, sans serif or serif
-simplistic graphics

Fem
-'oven ready' - emphasis on cooking element
-wording 'light, comforting'
-tomato sauce rather than meat sauce
-free range egg pasta
-natural ingredients

Image result for lasagne
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:47 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Macaroni Cheese Ready Meal Packaging

Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - More fem, green = healthy, handwritten style typeface
-Sprig of greens implies health

Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - more fem, handwritten type, 'made with love'  - feminine phrase
-"amys kitchen" implies feminine side







Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - more masc, blue colours
-'cheesey, rich, creamy' - implies unhealthy
-'easy' to make




Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - more masc, 'McIntosh of Strathmore'
-Spicy, large bold typeface, fire graphics "man food" vibe


Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - More masc, masculine logo, darker colours
-Serif and sans serif combination - 'strong' typefaces - 'family size'

Related image
Masc or fem? - more fem, weightwatchers, lots of green and blues
-Handwritten style typeface, healthy greens on pasta



Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - more masc, blues and browns
-Strong sans serif typeface



Image result for macaroni cheese ready meal
Masc or fem? - more masc, dark colours, strong serif type
-'devour' - manly
Posted by Bronte Webster at 02:38 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Lasagna Ready Meal Packaging

Image result for lasagna ready meal
Masc or Fem? - Very inbetween, maybe masc
-Manly logo, more feminine typeface for lasagna, swirl underneath type slightly feminine

Image result for lasagna ready meal
Masc or Fem - more fem as use of green implies healthy
-Strong bold typeface for lasagna, meal for one more handwritten feminine


Image result for lasagna ready meal
Masc or Fem - more masc, simplistic graphics, no fluffs or frills
-Sans serif typefaces, basic graphics, little info, big focus on price


Image result for lasagna ready meal
Masc or Fem - inbetween, more masc with logo, "meat and sauce" masculine connotations
-Mix between serif and sans serif, focus on imagery, 'family size' - big = manly




Image result for lasagna ready meal
Masc or fem - more fem, birds eye, blues and greens = healthy
-Sans serif typefaces, focus on price and recipe

Related image
Masc or fem - more fem, green = healthy
-Sans serif type, serif for lasagne





Masc or fem - masculine, dark colours "steak" - manly
-Sans serif, strong typeface
Posted by Bronte Webster at 02:15 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

Monday, 19 November 2018

COP 3 - Practical Ideas

My idea for the practical project is to take a ready meal and brand/package it in two different ways - one to appeal to females, the other to appeal to males. The idea is that it will demonstrate how the exact same product can be marketed in two different ways to two different audiences.

Good Housekeeping - 5 Most Popular Ready Meals

-Shepherds Pie
-Lasagna
-Chicken Tikka Masala
-Chicken Chow Mein
-Macaroni Cheese


I am considering either Lasagna or Macaroni Cheese are these two meals are the ones I feel are least gendered from the list of the top 5 most popular ready meals.


Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:15 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

Thursday, 8 November 2018

COP 3 - The Evolution of Packaging

https://medium.com/digital-packaging-experiences/the-evolution-of-packaging-57259054792d

The Evolution of Packaging

Chapter 03 — How innovations shaped packaging over 150 years

Product packaging plays several important functions which enable commerce and trade. The functions of modern day packaging go beyond containing, protecting and preserving products. It also includes functions to communicate, promote and transact products. Packaging provides several visceral cues designed to affect consumers perception of the product and influence their behavior.
These functions are considered normal today, but it took over 150 years for product packaging to evolve into a carefully designed artifact that integrates multiple functions of commerce into a thin film wrapped around products. Growing competition and continuous technological innovations have shaped the evolution of packaging since 1860s.
As we researched key technology and material innovations during this vast period, it became evident that these developments revolved closely around cultural phenomenon and consumer behaviors prevalent around given time periods. So we sectioned our analysis across 6 time periods and mapped the technological developments against cultural developments.
This approach provided unique lenses to look at the history of packaging and revealed very interesting perspectives on where things stand today and how we can design better for the future of packaging.
ndustrial revolution created a sudden demand for better products as trade flourished and more goods became available to consumer. Since materials were expensive, packaging was limited to luxury goods only. The period during and after WWI saw a remarkable number of packaging innovations like molded glass, cardboard boxes, metal cans, and cellophane that made packaging commonplace. This pushed manufacturers to establish an identity to sell to consumers.
The Great Depression marked the rise of supermarket culture and it drastically changed distribution and consumption patterns worldwide. This behavioral change of self-service model called for packaging to assume the role of a ‘silent-salesman’.Post WWII consumerism enjoyed the conveniences offered by the single use-and-throw materials that heralded with the discovery of aluminium foil, and plastics.
The rise of digital technologies in later half of 20th century allowed businesses to scale rapidly and become global. With unprecedented competition, packaging came to be the way of differentiating product on the shelf. As much as packaging has become essential to the business, it is also recognized as a threat to the environment. And hence much research continues not just to find new materials, but also to find optimal and sustainable solutions.
In last couple of decades, advances in personal computing, and mobiles have significantly transformed consumer behavior and thus their expectations. With access to information every time, every where, they value engaging experiences that provide a utility or novelty. Since the birth of barcodes, many digital technologies have continually been tested to bring reforms to retail experiences. And once again product packaging is at the center of these developments.
With the rising notion of the Internet of Things, coupled with advances in mobile computing, RFID, Augmented Reality, and Biosensors, we are at the tipping point where delightful digital experiences will position product packaging as an ESP or Emotional Selling Point.


Posted by Bronte Webster at 02:37 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

Wednesday, 7 November 2018

COP 3 - Gender Stereotypes and Food Preferences - Macho Nachos Study

http://www.socialjudgments.com/docs/Zhu_Brescoll_Newman_Uhlmann_2015.pdf
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:52 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Why Consumers Really Want Gendered Food Packaging

https://www.standuppouches.net/blog/why-consumers-really-want-gendered-product-packaging

Why Consumers Really Want Gendered Product Packaging

Gendered_Packaging

You may be familiar with the controversial “Women’s Tax,” also called the “Pink Tax,” where products marketed specifically toward female shoppers are more expensive than goods aimed toward their male counterparts.

Brands are making strides against this unfair marketing and pricing structure, with companies like Target eliminating gender-based signs in its stores and unisex cosmeticsemerging on the market. Still, it’s obvious that much progress still needs to be made in terms of developing and advertising products that are inclusive and not unfairly priced because of flowery graphics and colors aimed toward the female gender.
Interestingly, a new report shows stereotypically gendered packaging might not be so bad after all. Confused? Let’s explore the reasons why consumers might actually prefer “pink is for girls, blue is for boys” branding: People becsome wary of companies that stray from convention. Whether they’ve simply become conditioned to seek out certain colors and designs that they feel represents them as a customer, or they truly do prefer if a product looks “masculine” or “feminine,” this type of branding does help distinguish products from one another, and customers can easily find it, recognize it, and know it is conducive to their specific needs and lifestyles. However, think about the big picture here – companies do not have to rely on clichéd and outdated gender stereotypes to become identifiable on store shelves. Putting a little extra effort and thought into your product packaging design can help change consumer belief and perception about a product for the better, and it has the potential to create lasting change that can propel society forward.
GenderedIn the report mentioned above, the majority of respondents also claimed that food marketed as healthy and wholesome was decidedly more feminine, whereas unhealthy food was seen as more appealing to the male consumer. This illustrates the point, perhaps, that people are conditioned to believe healthy foods have a certain look and feel, and they expect the packaging to appear natural and subdued. Primary colors are often associated with candy, junk food, and products developed for children. Brands that specialize in healthy products can help shape and shift these perceptions by packaging their product in kraft stand up pouches and other bags that are environmentally friendly and, generally, gender neutral. It’s great if your target customer is of a certain specific demographic, but to appeal to a larger audience, it’s important to get the colors, design, branding, and packaging structure right.

Suppliers and successful producers alike know that packaging nutritious food in flimsy containers that rip, tear, and result in spoilage and waste just doesn’t make sense.

Packaging healthy products in puncture resistant, recyclable pouches and bags sends a message to consumers that the food inside is fresh, well protected, and produced sustainably with earthy ingredients. The packaging industry truly has power to reshape consumer perception of products, and brands that work closely with a supplier to design the way their products are presented can help draw in a whole new consumer base.
Despite what new research shows, companies don’t have to result in trite packaging design schemes like pink and “girl power” phrases for women, nor do they have to stick with “macho” product names and graphics to specifically target men. Words and images on your product packaging can make all the difference in how food is perceived – even its taste, the quality of product, and consumers’ opinions about your company. Food brands are already knocking down archaic stereotypes with packaging designs that have widespread appeal.
Beef jerky is a great example of a product that has traditionally been marketed to men using dark colors, bold text, and rugged graphics on its product packaging. Now, jerky brands are retooling their food packaging to promote their product as healthy and appealing to all consumers. No matter what goods your brand has out on the market,packaging is the first and easiest step toward shaping consumer awareness and drawing them in using graphics, branding, wording, and overall design to appeal to many rather than keeping specific shoppers in an antiquated box. The key is making your product recognizable in creative, innovative ways so shoppers don’t have to rely on outdated gender stereotyping.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:51 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Food and Drink Isn't Gendered

https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/08/food-and-drink-isnt-gendered-so-can-companies-please-stop-marketing-it-as-if-it-is-7369052/

Food and drink isn’t gendered – so can companies please stop marketing it as if it is?

Yet again, a company has run into trouble by attempting to create a product specifically for women. Hot on the heels of Doritos’ quickly canned ‘lady crisps’ idea, Brewdog are now doing a Pink IPA for women.

They maintain that their beer stunt wasn’t in earnest, and that they were actually sending up the trend of marketing products to women. In response to the backlash, they issued a statement saying that ‘the love of beer is not gendered’. They’re right. Anyone can love beer. So why did they write ‘beer for girls’ on the Pink IPA bottles? There’s a lot in our world that is marketed in a gendered way, from the unnecessary (razors, shampoo) to the slightly more sensible (clothes and so on). But food is fully, 100% not gendered. Men and women both eat. They are both physically capable of eating the EXACT SAME food. It’s not like women have four stomachs that allow them to digest grass while men don’t – our digestive systems are the same. Sure, men typically need to eat more food than women, as they require more calories to fuel their usually larger bodies. But that’s the only difference. All the other differences are down to personal taste – and ridiculous gendered marketing. It goes both ways – Diet Coke was firmly marketed towards women, so Coca Cola produced the more ‘manly’ Coke Zero Sugar, both of which have no calories and no sugar. The conclusion, therefore, is that the marketing was what stopped men from drinking Diet Coke, not the fact that it was sugar-free.

Other products over the years have marketed themselves as explicitly for men. McCoys crisps ran the tagline ‘Man Crisps’, while Yorkie Bars went with ‘it’s not for girls’ – although both have since changed their taglines. Women eat crisps and chocolate bars. We quite like them. Why any company would want to alienate half its potential consumers by marketing exclusively – and explicitly – to men is just baffling. It makes no business sense. Other brands go for a more subtle form of gendered marketing. Let’s stick with chocolate bars and look at Mars. Their ‘you’re not you when you’re hungry’ ad campaign for Snickers was heavily aimed at men, even depicting a man becoming a diva-ish Joan Collins due to his lack of Snickers. Meanwhile, Galaxy – also made by Mars – is firmly aimed at women, with its ads showing women curled up alone in a beautiful house and a chunky-knit jumper, getting all orgasmic over Galaxy chocolate. Somewhere along the line they decided men should like Snickers and women should like Galaxy. For no reason beyond an arbitrary marketing choice. It certainly has nothing to do with taste – I like Snickers and Galaxy equally. They’re both pretty great chocolate bars. It is possible to market something in a gender neutral but totally effective way – Cadbury have nailed it, with their drumming gorilla and acrobatic eyebrows. It requires slightly more imagination, perhaps. It’s very easy to fall into the boring habit of showing women luxuriating over a pot of yoghurt while men skateboard around with a Pepsi Max. Maybe the stats show that more women eat yoghurt and more men drink Pepsi Max, but it’s a chicken-and-egg situation – is yoghurt not advertised to men because they don’t buy it, or do they not buy it because advertising has told them it’s not for them? It’s time we started seeing food and drink for what it is – a tasty, non-gendered fuel (or treat).

Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:50 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Is Meat Manly?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/is-meat-manly-how-society-pressures-us-to-make-gendered-food-choices/2017/01/24/84669506-dce1-11e6-918c-99ede3c8cafa_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.979132105bb2

Is meat manly? How society pressures us to make gendered food choices.

In every country on the planet, men don’t live as long as women do. We’ve all come to accept this as a fact. After all, as my dad used to say, “It isn’t manly to go to the doctor.” This and many other gendered beliefs affect men and women’s health habits, including the types of foods they choose to eat.
For example, we’re constantly bombarded with advertising and social messaging telling us that eating like a bird and dining on salad is feminine, while eating large portions and plenty of red meat is manly. These oversimplified representations of female and male eating habits may seem outdated, but research shows they persist for many of us.
These socially influenced eating patterns could in part help explain why men are at a higher risk of heart disease and some cancers. Are our ideas about masculinity and femininity negatively affecting our health?
Manly meals and feminine foods
This may not come as a surprise, but overall, women have healthier eating habits than men. Research suggests this is mostly a learned response.
Luke Zhu, assistant professor at the University of Manitoba, researches societal aspects that affect food decisions.

[‘Clean eating’ is a fuzzy term — and that’s why it works]
Based on the research of his group and others, Zhu says in an email, “Unhealthy eating habits and foods (e.g. fries, nachos) are psychologically associated with masculinity while ‘healthy’ eating habits and foods (e.g. salad, organic food) are psychologically associated with femininity.”

oop de Boer is a retired social psychologist and guest researcher at VU University in Amsterdam. “Energy-dense, spicy and strongly flavored foods are perceived as masculine foods,” de Boer says, “while soft and sweet foods are perceived as feminine foods.”
Traditional gender beliefs could negatively affect your health
Do you like to have wine or beer with dinner? Do you have fruit or french fries with your lunch? Chances are, your answers could reveal your gender identity.
According to de Boer, markers of masculinity include eating a burger with fries for lunch, or having pizza and beer for dinner. Markers of femininity include eating pasta salad and fruit for lunch, or rice and vegetables with wine for dinner.
The health implications of these choices are obvious: Overall, women are choosing foods with more fiber and antioxidants, while men tend to overdo it on saturated fat and empty calories. This may be because women are more likely to seek out health information and, as de Boer says, buy in to information on the health aspects of specific foods — for instance, “super foods.”
De Boer suggests that men and women who see masculinity and femininity as less separate and strictly defined aren’t as different in their meat preferences, while those with more traditional gender beliefs are more likely to eat more meat if they’re men or to choose more sugar-laden desserts if they’re women.
“Our work shows that traditional framings of masculinity, emphasizing that ‘real men’ eat meat, are associated with the men’s preferences for large meat portions and almost no willingness to reduce,” de Boer says. For these men, “eating large meat portions is a marker of masculinity, which reflects traditional, patriarchal notions of power and performance.”
This deep-set belief could pose a serious threat to men’s health, as research suggests that incorporating more plant-based proteins can improve health and lengthen one’s life.

Zhu’s research has found that regardless of gender, people make different food choices when the concept of masculinity or femininity is brought up. “When we made the idea of masculinity salient, people preferred less-healthy food. When we did so with femininity, people chose healthier food.” As a result, women tend to be more comfortable making the healthier choice.
Culture also affects gender roles and therefore food choices. In recent research published in Appetite, de Boer and colleagues examined beliefs about meat among young adults in the Netherlands who were either second-generation Dutch, Chinese or Turkish. The second-generation Turkish adults expressed a stronger association between meat and masculinity, while the second-generation Dutch group held the weakest link between ideas of meat as masculine.
De Boer notes that people may try to manage their gender identity via food choices that could be positive or negative. For example, an individual might make unhealthy eating choices in an attempt to be more masculine — a change in behavior that could have serious health implications.
Overcoming gendered food stereotypes for better health
The goal of learning about the affect of gender on eating habits and health is to make it easier to make healthy food choices. Gender can be a strategic factor for both sexes.
Zhu and de Boer agree that increasing our awareness of gender-framed foods and eating behaviors gives us the power to change them.

hu also suggests that being more mindful when making food choices can help you focus on the food rather than on external factors. Ask yourself why you’re choosing a certain food. Is it peer pressure? Is it because it was advertised as a more masculine or feminine food? This awareness can help you make healthier food choices.
Individuals can reframe their behavior to change any gendered preconceptions , says de Boer. For example, cooking at home isn’t masculine or feminine — it’s an essential skill for eating well and taking care of yourself. De Boer says, “Men who cook and see this as a more feminine behavior can give it a ‘masculine makeover’ by portraying themselves as gourmands who cook and clean and are efficient and urbane.”
For the food and nutrition writers, advertisers and marketers out there, your messaging affects more than purchasing behavior: It affects health.
"We’ve found that people are more likely to choose unhealthy food if it’s packaged in masculine packaging,” Zhu says. “People have better evaluations and higher purchasing intentions for food that is unhealthy and packaged in masculine packaging.” The opposite was also true, suggesting that healthier food choices can be achieved by selling healthy food in more feminine packaging. It’s this type of purchasing psychology that could positively affect your health habits.
De Boer points out that popular men’s magazines can make vegetables and plant-based proteins appeal to readers by linking these foods to autonomy, performance and appearance-based goals. A man who believes in more-traditional gender roles may not eat more broccoli because of its cancer-fighting potential but because its nutrients could help support muscle growth. The same magazine also could have oversize steaks and racks of ribs in the same article. Whether you choose to buy that magazine or follow its advice is up to you.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:40 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - What Consumers Want

https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/8qkdg5/consumers-want-their-food-packaging-to-be-sexist

Consumers Want Their Food Packaging to Be Sexist

Buyers don't want packaged food that conflicts with their preconceived notions that junk food is manly and health food is girly, a new study shows.


Ever stopped to think about the difference between a nonfat yogurt commercial and a bacon cheeseburger commercial?
In the former, a fit twentysomething woman smiles at nothing in particular while sitting on a porch and neatly swirling key lime pie-flavored Yoplait or what-have-you with her spoon. In the latter, a husky dude is typically found biting into a burger while leaning against his truck, without a care in the world about the caloric content of his meal or that he's getting ketchup all over his face.
Are advertisers telling us that meat is masculine and diet-friendly food is girly, or are they playing into our preconceived notions of these stereotypes? Though it's difficult to say which came first, the chicken or the egg, a new study published in the journal Social Psychology touches upon how food manufacturers play into the pervasive belief that healthy food is somehow inherently feminine.
The report, conducted by the University of Manitoba and cheekily titled "Macho nachos: The implicit effects of gendered food packaging on preferences for healthy and unhealthy foods," surveyed 93 adults about how they would gender-categorize foods if they were prepared two different ways, with one version being healthier than the other (for example, baked chicken versus fried chicken, or light potato chips versus regular potato chips).
As one might suspect, the less-healthy options were perceived as more masculine by a landslide, while the foods prepared in more wholesome ways were seen as feminine. After all, there's nothing girlier than a tray of baked fish, right?
For the second part of the study, lead researcher Luke Zhu and his team presented participants with mini blueberry muffins that were packed in either a stereotypically feminine way—with an image of a ballerina and the word "healthy" emblazoned on the wrapper—or in a more "masculine" way, with pictures of men playing football and the word "mega." (How a miniature blueberry muffin can be considered "mega" is perhaps just one of life's greatest mysteries.) There were also some packages that mixed up the imagery and wordage in less conventional configurations.
Nobody really liked those ones. Apparently "mega" and ballerina just don't go together. The study subjects even said that those muffins tasted worse than the ones with more clearly gendered marketing, even though all of the muffins were the same
"With packaging, we expect healthy eating to be associated with femininity," Zhu told Time. "But what if healthy food is packaged in masculine packaging? That's an expectation violation."
The takeaway: even if advertisers and food manufacturers wanted to abandon the conventions of masculine versus feminine association with health or junk foods, consumers would be wary of it. Perhaps we're so conditioned to the idea of soothing packaging for organic foods and bold primary colors for processed crap, Zhu suggests, that our brains go a bit haywire at the thought of kale chips in a bright red, crinkly bag, or cheese doodles in a minimal white and green box. Ditto the image of a pilates instructor on our taco wrapper, or of an MMA fighter on our almond milk. And our psychology is so deeply tied into these aesthetics that they can even make food taste different.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:34 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Masculinities


http://www.raewynconnell.net/p/masculinities_20.html


MASCULINITIES


To speak of masculinities is to speak about gender relations.  Masculinities are not equivalent to men; they concern the position of men in a gender order.  They can be defined as the patterns of practice by which people (both men and women, though predominantly men) engage that position.

There is abundant evidence that masculinities are multiple, with internal complexities and even contradictions; also that masculinities change in history, and that women have a considerable role in making them, in interaction with boys and men. 

I have been an interested observer of masculinities all my life, but began to think of this as a researchable issue in the late 1970s.  At that time, anyone interested in power structures could see that the feminist challenge to patriarchy must mean changes in the lives of men.

A research project on secondary schools, described in the Education section, crystallized this idea.  Interviewing boys, teachers and parents, we could see active hierarchies of masculinity in school settings.  The term ‘hegemonic masculinity’ was first used in a 1982 report from this project, and my first essay on men and masculinities was published in the same year.

I managed to get funding for a study of social theories of gender.  The research assistant job was taken as a job-share by John Lee and Tim Carrigan, both knowledgeable about gay theory and politics.  We were soon developing a synthesis of ideas about masculinity from psychoanalysis, feminist theory, gay theory, and structural sociology. This was published in 1985 in a long article, 'Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity', that appeared just as a wave of interest in questions about men and masculinity was building up internationally.   Our paper was widely cited, several times reprinted and translated, and was seen as a founding text of ‘the new men’s studies’.

I didn’t think of it that way.  My theoretical concern was the gender order as a whole; masculinity was one piece of the jigsaw.  As an empirical researcher, I was very conscious of the thin base of evidence on which all discussions of masculinities rested at that time.  So I set up a fieldwork project, which was denounced by a right-wing group in federal parliament, before it even began.

The project turned out well, with a series of papers that described the dynamics of masculinities in different social settings.  Eventually this became the core of the book 
Masculinities.  I had been reluctant to write such a book, as I thought the genre of ‘Books About Men’ – astonishingly popular in the early 1990s – fostered the illusion of one fixed natural masculinity.  When I did start writing, the draft was promptly rejected by a well-known US publisher.

Other publishers kindly launched the book in 1995, and it seemed to meet a need.  It has been very widely cited, translated into six other languages, and went into a second edition in 2005.  It is in fact my best-known work, and I am charmed that it is cited in places as diverse as Voprosi Filosofii (Problems of Philosophy), the Shakespeare Quarterly, and Social Science & Medicine.

Social research on masculinities had obvious implications for practical problems, including violence prevention, the education of boys, action on men’s health, and the promotion of gender equality. With different groups of colleagues, I have written reports and papers that gather the research findings and concepts together to help activists and policy makers in all of those fields.  A number were collected in 
The Men and the Boys.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 03:31 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - Getting Gender-Specific Packaging Right

https://themarketcreative.com/gender-specific-packaging-design-sexist/


In modern society where equality prevails is gender specific packaging really appropriate? I explain why this can be essential for successful packaging design.
A quick trip to your local supermarket will highlight that gender differentiation is a fundamental strategy in the packaging of some products that are ostensibly identical, especially in the food, cosmetic and toiletry categories.
For the sake of this blog, I’m going to avoid the rights or wrongs for gender specific children’s toy packaging and instead explore packaging design for adult men and women.

 When personalisation becomes patronisation

There are plenty of brands where gender focus is core to their strategy – from Yorkie’s ‘it’s not for girls’ or Lambrini’s ‘girls just want to have fun’.
I personally find these cringe worthy at best and clichéd messaging based on stereotypes rather than effectively targeted at their audience. Some US TV ad imports can be particularly patronising with Gillette and Diet Coke springing to mind.
Within packaging design as well, I believe it is easy to go too far – with Gillette, for example, again pursuing an extremely simplistic ‘blue’ for men and ‘pink’ for women tactic. With this level of gender stereotyping, there is risk of alienating more sophisticated shoppers.

 Getting gender specific packaging right

Here are three key areas you should consider to get the balance just right:
  1. It is very easy to focus on the rational deliverable elements of packaging design such as featuring the brand, displaying the product and explaining features, while losing sight of the more emotive requirements. Keep the design simple and clean to broaden appeal. Use of textures, tactile materials and shape can create strong gender-specific appeal without resorting to stereotypes.
  1. While targeting your pack design will help with appeal to a particular gender, remember that in modern society gender roles are less traditional. Historically gender-specific products are increasingly likely to be bought and used by either gender, so you could well be alienating a larger percentage of potential shoppers.
  1. Understand that the consumer and shopper can often be different people. Packaging design needs to appeal to the shopper at point of purchase and the ultimate consumer. It is more important to represent the personality of the brand and product benefits than overly focus on the gender of the consumer.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 02:38 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601

COP 3 - How We Perceive Food Products

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/gendered-packaging-influences-what-we-buy-how-we-perceive-food-products-1.3277895

Gendered packaging influences what we buy, how we perceive food products



  • A new Canadian study has found that gender-specific packaging influences what we buy in the grocery store, and also whether we think the products are good for us.

    More stereotypically feminine packaging, with subtle colours and script-style fonts, is used for healthier foods, while more masculine packaging with bold colours and large fonts is often wrapped around less healthy items. 
    In ads for those products, you might see a woman twirl around her pink dining room while spooning up yogurt from a small cup and extolling its low-fat virtues. Contrast that with ultra-fit men diving off cliffs, snowboarding on remote mountains, and slam-dunking basketballs in slow motion while promoting an energy drink.

    These television ads aren't exactly subtle. They play to stereotypical ideas of what it means to be masculine or feminine in modern culture. 
    Luke Zhu is an assistant professor of business administration at the University of Manitoba. He said that although they might not realize it, consumers overwhelmingly choose foods based on their gender-packaging.

    Starting in 2013, Zhu worked with researchers at Yale and INSEAD, an international business school with campuses in France, Asia and the Middle East. Their study, called "Macho Nacho," was recently published in the journal Social Psychology. 
    Yoplait packaging is more stereotypically feminine in font and colour choices. (Yoplait/Facebook)
    Part of the study involved subjects separating foods into "male" or "female" categories — like baked versus fried chicken, or baked versus regular potato chips. Subjects also named their preference.
    Generally speaking, people associated the less healthy foods with masculinity, and the healthier options with femininity.
    In another part of the study, the exact same blueberry muffins were packaged several different ways. One featured a football background, along with a high-energy or power message, using the word "mega."
    The second package was more feminine, featuring ballerinas and a message using the word "healthy."
    Package three mixed the masculine image with a feminine message. And a fourth package combined a feminine image with a masculine message.
    In the two instances where the packaging and message matched the stereotype — masculine packaging with a masculine message, or feminine packaging and messaging — subjects were willing to pay more for the muffin, and believed it tasted better. 
    When the messaging was mixed up, pairing a masculine image with a feminine message, people said the muffin didn't taste as good.
    Zhu said those are powerful findings, especially if you're trying to make conscious decisions about your diet.

    "As researchers ... we are more concerned with ordinary people who want to maintain a healthy lifestyle," he explained. "Most of the time we tend to think that our decisions, all of our decisions, are made rationally with evidence and reasoning. But no, all these little cues in our surrounding environment can have a huge impact on what we think and what we decide to do."

    And Zhu added that for food companies, matching gender stereotypes to packaging will mean better sales. 
    "The takeaway message from our study is ... that, especially for food manufacturers, you have to position your product well. That means if your food is genuinely healthy, then your packaging needs to be consistent with that — that means feminine."
    And he said if a product is less healthy or maybe high-energy, go for masculine packaging. 
    Despite his findings, it doesn't mean food companies aren't trying to break these stereotypes.
Posted by Bronte Webster at 02:35 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: OUGD601
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Blog Links

  • Studio Practice
  • Personal & Professional Practice
  • Personal Homepage

About Me

Bronte Webster
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2018 (96)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ▼  November (19)
      • COP 3 - Saucy Fish Co.
      • COP 3 - Names and Other Ideas
      • COP 3 - Macaroni Cheese Ready Meal Packaging
      • COP 3 - Lasagna Ready Meal Packaging
      • COP 3 - Practical Ideas
      • COP 3 - The Evolution of Packaging
      • COP 3 - Gender Stereotypes and Food Preferences - ...
      • COP 3 - Why Consumers Really Want Gendered Food Pa...
      • COP 3 - Food and Drink Isn't Gendered
      • COP 3 - Is Meat Manly?
      • COP 3 - What Consumers Want
      • COP 3 - Masculinities
      • COP 3 - Getting Gender-Specific Packaging Right
      • COP 3 - How We Perceive Food Products
      • COP 3 - Gender Specific Packaging
      • COP 3 - Sexist Packaging
      • COP 3 - Burgers Are For Boys, Salads Are For Girls
      • COP 3 - Gendered Packaging Influence
      • COP 3 - Gender-Targeted Packaging
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (30)
  • ►  2017 (20)
    • ►  April (20)
  • ►  2016 (9)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.